2007 - 2008 Supreme Court Decisions
-
COCAINE SENTENCING
U.S. District Court judges can consider the impact of the disparity in the federal sentencing guidelines - a 100:1 ratio in sentences established by Congress - for crack and powder cocaine crimes.
Kimbrough v. U.S, No. 06-6330, Lawyers USA No. 9938848. Dec 10, 2007.
Click here for Lawyers USA's story.
-
CRIMINAL LAW
The U.S. Supreme Court will not decide if a federal court can determine that an offense that is not an aggravated felony is still a "particularly serious crime" that bars a defendant's eligibility for withholding of removal. The case has been voluntarily dismissed.
Ali v. Anchim, No. 06-1346. Dec 21, 2007.When a defendant trades a gun for illegal drugs, this does not constitute "use" of a handgun during a drug crime, leading to a mandatory five-year sentence.
Watson v. U.S., No. 06-571, Lawyers USA No. 9938849. Dec 10, 2007.A defendant's state convictions for violent misdemeanors count as predicate offenses under the federal Armed Career Criminal Act's sentencing enhancement provisions, because his civil rights were never lost.
Logan v. U.S., No. 06-6911, Lawyers USA No. 9938832. Dec 4, 2007.
Click here for Lawyers USA's story.
-
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
An attorney's assistance is not presumptively ineffective where counsel participated in a plea hearing by speaker phone.
Wright v. Van Patten, No. 07-212, Lawyers USA No. 9939096. Jan 7, 2008.The U.S. Supreme Court will not decide if an ineffective assistance of counsel ruling may stand where the defendant did not claim he would have accepted a plea agreement but for his attorney's advice, because the defendant has abandoned his claim of ineffective assistance.
Arave v. Hoffman, No. 07-110, Lawyers USA No. 9939055. Jan 7, 2008.A post-conviction state court petition that was dismissed as untimely cannot toll the 1-year statute of limitation for filing a federal habeas petition under the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act.
Allen v. Siebert, No. 06-1680, Lawyers USA No. 9938622. Nov 5, 2007.
-
ELECTIONS
New York's convention system of choosing trial court judge nominees does not violate the First Amendment.
State Board of Elections v. Lopez Torres, No. 06-766, Lawyers USA No. 9939098. Jan 16, 2008.
-
FEDERAL TORT CLAIMS ACT
An inmate cannot sue corrections officers over allegedly detained or mishandled goods under the Federal Torts Claims Act, because a corrections officer is considered a “law enforcement official” under the Act.
Ali v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, No. 06-9130, Lawyers USA No. 9939118. Jan 22, 2008.
-
PRIVATE TUITION
The Individuals with Disabilities Act allows parents to seek tuition reimbursement for private school costs for a child who never attended public school.
Board of Education of the City School District of the City of New York v. Tom F., No. 06-637, Lawyers USA No.. Oct 10, 2007.
Click here for Lawyers USA's story.
-
SECURITIES FRAUD
Investors in a company that committed fraud may not impose liability under the Securities Exchange Act against the company's vendors for their role in the scheme.
Stoneridge Investment Partners, LLC v. Scientifica-Atlanta, Inc., No. 06-43, Lawyers USA No. 9939084. Jan 15, 2008.
Click here for Lawyers USA's story.
-
SENTENCING GUIDELINES
A federal district court judge can sentence a defendant to a term below the federal sentencing guidelines range.
Gall v. U.S., No. 06-7949, Lawyers USA No. 993885. Dec 10, 2007.
Click here for Lawyers USA's story.
-
STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS
Courts must consider whether the Tucker Act 's statute of limitations restricts the subject matter jurisdiction of the U.S. Court of Federal Claims, even if the issue is not raised by the parties.
John R. Sand & Gravel Co. v. U.S., No. 06-1164, Lawyers USA No. 9939097. Jan 8, 2008.
-
TAXATION
Investment advisory fees incurred by a trust are generally subject to the same two percent floor applied to individuals for the deduction of itemized expenses from adjusted gross income, except where those fees would not have been incurred if the property were not held in a trust.
Knight v. Commissioner, No. 06-1286, Lawyers USA No. 9939087. Jan 16, 2008.
Click here for Lawyers USA's story.A railroad can challenge a state's methodology for valuing the railroad for tax purposes.
CSX Transportation, Inc. v. Georgia State Board of Equalization, No. 06-1287, Lawyers USA No. 9938851. Dec 4, 2007.